Should Abortion Details Be Posted Online? - posted details of judy nguyen and zachery tims
Oklahoma recently passed a law that states that personal data will be published by any abortion on a public website. One of the published data, is the reason for the requested procedure.
Agree or disagree?
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feat ...
Friday, February 5, 2010
Posted Details Of Judy Nguyen And Zachery Tims Should Abortion Details Be Posted Online?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
I think now the homosexual and the abortionist can relate .....
It would be a violation of HIPAA, which would make the government of criminal responsibility. It is a law without teeth. The prosecutors finally stop state employees such as the provision of a site.
You see HIPAA protects all patients in your medical history will be (something) without the consent published. The legislature is wasting time and money on a law not be enacted. And if it is assumed that the employees can be created in the site idiot. He has to pay penalty (the agency and individuals) and possible arrest.
I do not like abortion, but it is legal and privacy of a medical procedure is protected by federal law. It is a fundamental legal contract that the federal government has in place for the right to privacy of individuals by ... and applied. I can guarantee, dass
You talk about fascism and intimidation of persons appointed by the government ... she finally met a true example of it here.
No, you should do it. Sounds of the article, they dance, with bills to HIPAA. Makes as much sense as the publication of test results online ... Herpes or hemorrhoids surgery ... Or maybe your tummy tuck or facelift. Health information is between the patient and nursing staff. We must protect at all costs, no matter how much you agree with the procedure performed. If we are not a reasonable expectation that our health information is private, then you simply need to take now.
No, you should do it. Not only do these women violated the right to privacy, but also their right to personal security. The proponents of this scheme are a fan of begging to see the names of these women up to find it, then hurt. If a woman ends up injured as a result of this list, your blood on the hands of legislators who supported this law.
And if the stools of people watched the game in all this is bloody. Blood in the urine and Details May twice before they think children
Or
Maybe we can show photos of all sexual and physical abuse happens to children who are unwanted by their parents and will not be accepted well enough.
In the moral world of the pro-life is terribly perverse falsely a painless death after 8 weeks of conception a goal that is far worse than a painful and violent death at birth to 8 years
Terminal does not have a problem if someone twittered a miscarriage at lunchtime.
God I hate liberals privacy. When the Liberals took over in Oklahoma?
Medical records are private. No
"Baby Killer"
A fetus in the womb is a collection of atoms, not a baby.
This was never, never happen again. The courts determine legitimate that shit out to infringe on individual rights.
I disagree. Operation only with people in the back room, as in the '50s and '60s and earlier. It is not someone think twice. Not looking for abortion before the embryo can not be living in their own death, and I am sure that many others do not. Why are they ashamed? I think it is better to contraception, the morning-after pill "and all of a business man must be. I think it's more conservatives are trying to tell people how they live their lives. OK, I might add, do not visit my list of places to visit.
Edit: if the state will force women to have children, the state tries to embarrass must care for the child brought up to the age and persons to take the law and by those who should vote for them will be introduced for to pay for this care.
Post a Comment